Clause 26 - Relations with the Public and the Media

26.1 Prescription only medicines must not be advertised to the public. This prohibition does not apply to vaccination campaigns carried out by companies and approved by the health ministers.

  • Clause 26.1 Advertising of Medicines to the Public

    The advertising of prescription only medicines to the public is also prohibited by the relevant regulations relating to advertising.

    The promotion of medicines to the public for self medication purposes is covered by the Consumer Code of the Proprietary Association of Great Britain (PAGB).

most recent cases See all Applicable Code year
Applicable Code year

Please check the date of the Code that applies to the Case that you are looking at. The date of the complaint may vary from the activity/material alleged to have been in breach.

AUTH/3774/6/23 – Complainant v AstraZeneca Breach: 2, 3.1, 9.1, 26.1 No breach: 3.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 06 June 2023 Completed: 21 October 2024 AUTH/3494/3/21 - Complainant v Bristol-Myers Squibb Breach: 4.1, 9.1, 26.1 No breach: 2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 22 March 2021 Completed: 17 January 2022 AUTH/3428/11/20 - Anonymous, contactable complainant v Leo Breach: 2, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 4.8, 7.2, 7.9, 9.1, 14.1, 14.3, 26.1 No breach: 3.1, 4.1, 4.3, 4.10, 7.2, 7.10, 9.1, 14.1, 14.3, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 11 November 2020 Completed: 12 January 2022 AUTH/3533/7/21 - Complainant v Allergan Breach: 2, 3.1, 4.1, 4.9, 9.1, 14.1, 26.1 No breach: 3.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 05 July 2021 Completed: 14 December 2021 AUTH/3499/4/21 - Complainant v Daiichi Sankyo Breach: 4.1, 9.1, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1, 28.3, 29 No breach: 2, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 02 April 2021 Completed: 06 December 2021 AUTH/3502/4/21 - Complainant v Daiichi Sankyo Breach: 4.1, 7.10, 9.1, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1, 28.3, 29 No breach: 2, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 10 April 2021 Completed: 06 December 2021 AUTH/3507/5/21 and AUTH/3513/5/21 - Complainant v Daiichi-Sankyo Breach: 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 7.2, 7.4, 9.1, 11.1, 29 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 03 May 2021 Completed: 06 December 2021 AUTH/3431/11/20 - Complainant v Allergan Breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1 No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1, 29 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 20 November 2020 Completed: 29 October 2021 AUTH/3479/2/21 - Complainant v Almirall Breach: 4.1, 9.1, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 14.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 25 February 2021 Completed: 11 October 2021 AUTH/3473/2/21 - Complainant v Alnylam Breach: 26.1 No breach: 2, 9.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 10 February 2021 Completed: 12 August 2021 AUTH/3421/11/20 - Complainant v Novartis Breach: 4.3, 9.1, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 26.3, 29 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 13 November 2020 Completed: 22 July 2021 AUTH/3414/11/20 - Complainant v Novartis Breach: 3.1, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.3 No breach: 2, 3.1, 4.1, 4.3, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 04 November 2020 Completed: 16 July 2021 AUTH/3435/12/20 - Complainant v Alimera Breach: 4.1, 9.1, 26.1 No breach: 2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 03 December 2020 Completed: 30 June 2021 AUTH/3404/10/20 - Indivior v Camurus Breach: 2, 4.1, 4.3, 4.9, 9.1, 9.10, 12.1, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1 No breach: 9.10 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 22 October 2020 Completed: 22 June 2021 AUTH/3461/1/21 - Health professional v Santen Breach: 4.3, 9.1, 26.1 No breach: 4.7, 7.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 21 January 2021 Completed: 17 June 2021 AUTH/3410/10/20 - Complainant v Ipsen Breach: 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 30 October 2020 Completed: 02 June 2021 AUTH/3403/10/20 - Complainant v Consilient Breach: 2, 9.1, 14.5, 26.1 No breach: 4.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 21 October 2020 Completed: 12 April 2021 AUTH/3398/10/20 - Voluntary admission by Merck Sharp & Dohme Breach: 9.1, 26.1 No breach: 2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 08 October 2020 Completed: 15 March 2021 AUTH/3389/9/20 - Voluntary admission by Sandoz Breach: 9.1, 9.8, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 30 September 2020 Completed: 12 March 2021 AUTH/3372/8/20 - Complainant v Bristol-Myers Squibb Breach: 3.2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 12 August 2020 Completed: 29 January 2021 AUTH/3347/5/20 - Member of the public v Strides Pharma Breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 12 May 2020 Completed: 01 December 2020 AUTH/3339/4/20 - Employee v Accord Breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 27 April 2020 Completed: 30 November 2020 AUTH/3309/2/20 - Complainant v Sintetica Breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 9.1, 14.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 16 February 2020 Completed: 19 November 2020 AUTH/3271/10/19 - Complainant v Napp Breach: 7.2, 7.9, 9.1, 26.1, 28.1 No breach: 2, 4.1, 7.4 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 28 October 2019 Completed: 25 September 2020 AUTH/3362/6/20 - Voluntary admission by Roche Breach: 9.1, 26.1 No breach: 2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 12 June 2020 Completed: 17 September 2020 AUTH/3297/1/20 - Complainant v Britannia Breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1 No breach: 2, 9.1, 22.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 06 January 2020 Completed: 14 September 2020 AUTH/3276/10/19 - Complainant v Ipsen Breach: 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 3.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 25 October 2019 Completed: 28 August 2020 AUTH/3303/1/20 - Anonymous complainant v Vifor Breach: 7.2, 7.4, 9.1, 26.1, 28.1, 28.3 No breach: 2, 4.1, 4.9, 7.2, 7.4, 9.1, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 23 January 2020 Completed: 03 August 2020 AUTH/3343/5/20 - Complainant v Shionogi Europe Breach: 2, 3.1, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 04 May 2020 Completed: 24 July 2020 AUTH/3334/4/20 - Health professional v Rayner Breach: 2, 9.1, 9.8, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 21 April 2020 Completed: 03 July 2020 AUTH/3203/6/19 - Anonymous employee v Otsuka Europe Breach: 9.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1 No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 07 June 2019 Completed: 23 April 2020 AUTH/3291/12/19 - Aesthetics Health Professional v Allergan Breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 17 December 2019 Completed: 16 March 2020 AUTH/3248/9/19 - Voluntary admission by AstraZeneca Breach: 3.2, 9.1, 14.3, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 30 September 2019 Completed: 07 February 2020 AUTH/3252/10/19 - Complainant v Lilly Breach: 9.1, 26.1, 28.1 No breach: 2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 07 October 2019 Completed: 07 February 2020 AUTH/3231/7/19 and AUTH/3255/7/19 - Complainant v Shield and Norgine Breach: 7.2, 7.4, 26.1 No breach: 3.2, 7.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 26 July 2019 Completed: 28 January 2020 AUTH/3230/7/19 - Complainant v GlaxoSmithKline Breach: 26.1 No breach: 4.1, 4.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 26 July 2019 Completed: 12 December 2019 AUTH/3208/6/19 - Member of the public v Merz Breach: 9.1, 15.2, 26.1 No breach: 2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 19 June 2019 Completed: 12 September 2019 AUTH/3503/4/21 - Complainant v Leo Breach: 2, 3.2, 4.10, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.9, 7.10, 9.1 No breach: 2, 3.2, 4.1, 4.6, 4.9, 4.10, 7.2, 7.4, 7.6, 7.9, 7.10, 9.1, 9.2, 9.6, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 13 April 2021 Completed: 08 December 2022 AUTH/3524/6/21 - Complainant/Director v GlaxoSmithKline No breach: 2, 3.1, 9.1, 26.1, 29 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 22 June 2021 Completed: 15 September 2022 AUTH/3518/5/21 - Member of the public v AstraZeneca Breach: 7.2, 7.9, 9.1 No breach: 2, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 27 May 2021 Completed: 07 July 2022 AUTH/3523/6/21 - Complainant v Novo Nordisk No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 22 June 2021 Completed: 22 June 2022 AUTH/3483/3/21 - Complainant v Eli Lilly Breach: 3.1, 9.1 No breach: 2, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 04 March 2021 Completed: 18 January 2022 AUTH/3497/3/21 - Complainant v Daiichi Sankyo Breach: 7.2, 9.1 No breach: 2, 4.1, 7.2, 7.9, 9.1, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 27 March 2021 Completed: 16 December 2021 AUTH/3411/10/20 and AUTH/3412/10/20 - Complainant v Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca Breach: 3.1, 9.1 No breach: 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 02 November 2020 Completed: 14 December 2021 AUTH/3430/11/20 - Complainant v AstraZeneca Breach: 2, 3.1, 9.1 No breach: 2, 26.1, 29 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 24 November 2020 Completed: 14 December 2021 AUTH/3476/2/21 - Anonymous, contactable v Leo No breach: 2, 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.8, 4.10, 7.2, 7.3, 7.9, 7.11, 9.1, 12.1, 14.1, 14.3, 15.2, 15.9, 18.1, 19.1, 26.1, 26.2, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 09 February 2021 Completed: 18 November 2021 AUTH/3441/12/20: Contactable ex-employee v Allergan No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 13 December 2020 Completed: 01 October 2021 AUTH/3488/3/21 - Complainant v AstraZeneca Breach: 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 9.1, 14.1 No breach: 2, 4.3, 7.2, 7.4, 7.9, 7.10, 9.1, 9.7, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 10 March 2021 Completed: 29 September 2021 AUTH/3463/1/21 - Complainant v Lundbeck Breach: 14.5 No breach: 2, 3.1, 4.1, 4.9, 9.1, 12.1, 14.1, 14.3, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 25 January 2021 Completed: 27 September 2021 AUTH/3406/10/20 - Complainant v Chiesi No breach: 2, 7.2, 8.1, 9.1, 26.1, 28.1, 28.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 23 October 2020 Completed: 16 September 2021 AUTH/3405/10/20 - Complainant v Leo Breach: 4.1, 4.5, 4.6, 4.9, 9.1, 14.1, 14.3, 28.1 No breach: 2, 3.1, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.8, 4.9, 9.10, 14.1, 14.3, 16.1, 18.1, 26.1, 26.2, 26.3, 28.1, 28.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 25 October 2020 Completed: 10 September 2021 AUTH/3478/2/21 - Complainant v Boehringer Ingelheim No breach: 2, 3.1, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 22 February 2021 Completed: 07 September 2021 AUTH/3442/12/20 - Complainant v GlaxoSmithKline No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 19 December 2020 Completed: 02 September 2021 AUTH/3400/10/20 - Complainant v Novartis Breach: 2, 3.1, 9.1, 9.10, 12.1, 14.1, 28.1 No breach: 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 18 October 2020 Completed: 16 August 2021 AUTH/3450/1/21 - Complainant v Lundbeck Breach: 4.1, 4.9, 9.1, 14.1 No breach: 2, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1, 28.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 05 January 2021 Completed: 05 August 2021 AUTH/3456/1/21 and AUTH/3457/1/21 - Complainant v Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly No breach: 2, 3.2, 4.1, 7.2, 7.4, 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 19 January 2021 Completed: 19 July 2021 AUTH/3438/12/20 - Complainant v Pfizer Breach: 2, 7.9, 9.1 No breach: 7.10, 12.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2020 Received: 04 December 2020 Completed: 08 June 2021 AUTH/3434/12/20 - Complainant v A.Menarini Breach: 9.1 No breach: 2, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 02 December 2020 Completed: 04 June 2021 AUTH/3422/11/20 - Complainant v Pfizer Breach: 3.1, 9.1, 14.1 No breach: 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 12 November 2020 Completed: 04 June 2021 AUTH/3437/12/20 - Complainant v Pfizer Breach: 2, 9.1 No breach: 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 04 December 2020 Completed: 04 June 2021 AUTH/3444/12/20 - Complainant v Takeda Breach: 9.1 No breach: 2, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 19 December 2020 Completed: 04 June 2021 AUTH/3417/11/20 - Complainant v Daiichi-Sankyo Breach: 9.1, 9.10, 22.4 No breach: 2, 4.1, 4.2, 4.5, 4.4, 4.6, 4.8, 4.9, 4.10, 9.1, 11.1, 12.1, 14.1, 14.5, 14.6, 23.1 , 26.1, 28.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 09 November 2020 Completed: 27 May 2021 AUTH/3388/9/20 - Complainant v Daiichi-Sankyo Breach: 4.1, 4.3, 4.6, 4.8, 4.9, 4.10, 9.1, 24.1 No breach: 2, 26.1, 27.2, 27.9, 28.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 24 September 2020 Completed: 22 April 2021 AUTH/3409/10/20 - Complainant v Daiichi Sankyo Breach: 2, 3.2, 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.8, 4.9, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.10, 9.1, 14.1 No breach: 9.1, 9.9, 9.10, 11.1, 11.3, 12.1, 14.5, 23.1 , 23.2, 24.1, 24.2, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 29 October 2020 Completed: 01 April 2021 AUTH/3369/8/20 - Complainant v Pfizer No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 11 August 2020 Completed: 29 March 2021 Complainant v Chugai No breach: 4.1, 9.1, 14.5, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 10 September 2020 Completed: 29 March 2021 AUTH/3384/9/20 - Complainant v Bayer No breach: 4.1, 9.1, 14.5, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 09 September 2020 Completed: 29 March 2021 AUTH/3393/10/20 - Anonymous v Boehringer Ingelheim No breach: 2, 9.1, 12.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 04 October 2020 Completed: 19 March 2021 AUTH/3364/6/20 - Complainant v AstraZeneca No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 18 June 2020 Completed: 18 March 2021 AUTH/3390/9/20 - Complainant v Janssen Breach: 3.1, 9.1 No breach: 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 30 September 2020 Completed: 01 March 2021 AUTH/3311/2/20 - Complainant v Leo Breach: 2, 3.1, 9.1 No breach: 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 18 February 2020 Completed: 25 February 2021 AUTH/3386/9/20 - Health professional v GlaxoSmithKline No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2, 26.3, 28.6 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 14 September 2020 Completed: 19 February 2021 AUTH/3357/5/20 - Complainant v Colonis AUTH/3357/5/20 - Complainant v Colonis No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1, 28.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 29 May 2020 Completed: 11 February 2021 AUTH/3383/9/20 - Complainant v Amgen AUTH/3383/9/20 - Complainant v Amgen No breach: 3.2, 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 10 September 2020 Completed: 29 January 2021 AUTH/3329/3/20 - Complainant v Boehringer Ingelheim No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 14 April 2020 Completed: 26 January 2021 AUTH/3336/4/20 - Anonymous v Bio Products Laboratory AUTH/3336/4/20 - Anonymous v Bio Products Laboratory No breach: 2, 7.2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 23 April 2020 Completed: 07 January 2021 AUTH/3337/4/20 - Anonymous v Bio Products Laboratory No breach: 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 23 April 2020 Completed: 07 January 2021 AUTH/3333/4/20 - Health professional v Novo Nordisk Breach: 9.1 No breach: 2, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 20 April 2020 Completed: 09 December 2020 AUTH/3439/12/20 - Complainant v Amgen Breach: 9.1 No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 07 December 2020 Completed: 07 December 2020 AUTH/3315/3/20 – Anonymous v Novo Nordisk No breach: 9.1, 9.2, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 05 March 2020 Completed: 17 September 2020 AUTH/3288/12/19 - NHS Worker v Biogen No breach: 2, 9.1, 12.1, 15.2, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 13 December 2019 Completed: 16 September 2020 AUTH/3270/10/19 - Complainant v Bayer Breach: 9.1 No breach: 2, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 25 October 2019 Completed: 05 August 2020 AUTH/3263/11/19 - Anonymous v Almirall Breach: 7.2, 7.4, 9.1, 28.1 No breach: 2, 12.1, 14.1, 14.3, 26.1, 28.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 17 October 2019 Completed: 05 August 2020 AUTH/3266/10/19 and AUTH/3279/11/19 - Health Professional v Otsuka UK and Otsuka Europe Breach: 7.2, 7.4, 7.9, 9.1 No breach: 7.2, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 26 September 2019 Completed: 15 May 2020 AUTH/3204/6/19 - Anonymous pharmaceutical employee v GlaxoSmithKline No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 07 June 2019 Completed: 27 April 2020 AUTH/3273/10/19 - Complainant v Gedeon Richter Breach: 4.3, 9.1 No breach: 2, 12.1, 26.1, 28.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 28 October 2019 Completed: 24 April 2020 AUTH/3287/12/19 - Employee v UCB Breach: 3.1, 14.1, 9.1 No breach: 2, 4.1, 4.9, 4.10, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 13 December 2019 Completed: 27 March 2020 AUTH/3232/7/19 AND AUTH/3233/7/19 - Member of the public v Eli Lilly and Boehringer Ingelheim No breach: 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 27 July 2019 Completed: 05 December 2019 AUTH/3310/2/20: Ex-employee v Indivior No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 17 February 2020 Completed: 21 May 2019

26.2 Information about prescription only medicines which is made available to the public either directly or indirectly must be factual and presented in a balanced way. It must not raise unfounded hopes of successful treatment or be misleading with respect to the safety of the product.

Statements must not be made for the purpose of encouraging members of the public to ask their health professional to prescribe a specific prescription only medicine.

  • Clause 26.2 Information to the Public

    This clause allows for the provision of non-promotional information about prescription only medicines to the public either in response to a direct enquiry from an individual, including enquiries from journalists, or by dissemination of such information via press conferences, press announcements, television and radio reports, public relations activities and the like. It also includes information provided by means of posters distributed for display in surgery waiting rooms etc and reference information made available by companies on their websites or otherwise as a resource for members of the public.

    Any information so provided must observe the principles set out in this clause; that is, it should be factual, balanced and must not be made for the purpose of encouraging members of the public to ask their doctors or other prescribers to prescribe a specific prescription only medicine. It must not constitute the advertising of prescription only medicines to the public prohibited under Clause 26.1. The provisions of Clause 26.4 must be observed if an enquiry is from an individual member of the public.

    Information to the public falls into one of three categories depending on its purpose, how it is supplied and how the public is made aware of the information. Companies should take particular care if they use social media.

    Proactive information is supplied to the public without a direct request. This includes booklets on diseases and/or medicines supplied directly or via a health professional, press releases, briefings, conferences, mailings to patient organisations and disease awareness advertising.

    Reference information is intended to provide a comprehensive up-to-date resource that companies should make available on their websites or by way of a link from their website or by some other means. The primary purpose of reference information is to be a library resource for members of the public giving information relating to prescription only medicines which have marketing authorizations. Pharmaceutical companies are not obliged to provide reference information but it is considered good practice to provide as a minimum the regulatory information comprising the summary of product characteristics (SPC), the package leaflet (PIL) and the public assessment report (PAR) (UK or European) where such a document exists. Reference information may also include the registration studies used for marketing authorization applications and variations and any other studies published or not including those referred to in the SPC, PIL, EPAR or UKPAR or available on clinical trial databases. Reference information may also include material supplied for health technology assessments to bodies such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the All Wales Medicines Strategy Group (AWMSG) and the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC).

    Reference information may also include medicine guides where available, studies (published or not), information about diseases and information about specific medicines etc.

    Where companies decide to make reference information available this must represent fairly the current body of evidence relating to a medicine and its benefit/risk profile.

    Reactive information is supplied to the public in response to a direct request and must be limited to that information necessary to respond to the request.

    It is good practice to include the summary of product characteristics with a press release or press pack relating to a medicine. Companies should also consider including references to other credible sources of information about a condition or a medicine.

    Particular care must be taken in responding to approaches from the media to ensure that the provisions of this clause are upheld.

    In the event of a complaint which relates to the provisions of this clause, companies will be asked to provide copies of any information supplied, including copies of any relevant press releases and the like. This information will be assessed to determine whether it fulfills the requirements of this clause.

    Public assessment reports (European or UK), summaries of product characteristics and package leaflets may be provided to members of the public on request.

    Companies may provide members of the health professions with material concerning a medicine with a view to its provision to patients to whom the medicine has already been prescribed. Such material must be factual and non-promotional and clearly state the intended audience.

    A company may conduct a disease awareness or public health campaign provided that the purpose is to encourage members of the public to seek treatment for their symptoms while in no way promoting the use of a specific medicine. The use of brand or non-proprietary names and/or restricting the range of treatments described in the campaign might be likely to lead to the use of a specific medicine. Particular care must be taken where the company’s product, even though not named, is the only medicine relevant to the disease or symptoms in question.

    Attention is drawn to the Disease Awareness Campaigns Guidelines produced by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.

    The requirements of Clause 7 relating to information (Clauses 7.2, 7.4, 7.5, 7.8, 7.9, 7.10 and 7.11) also apply to information to the public.

    Meetings organised for or attended by members of the public, journalists and patient organisations must comply with Clause 22.

    Items for patients or for use by patients are covered in Clause 18.2. and its supplementary information.

  • Clause 26.2 Financial Information

    Information made available in order to inform shareholders, the Stock Exchange and the like by way of annual reports and announcements etc may relate to both existing medicines and those not yet marketed. Such information must be non-promotional, accurate, presented in a factual and balanced way and not misleading, taking into account the information needs of the target audience. Clause 7 shall not apply to such information.

    Business press releases should identify the business importance of the information and should only be aimed at the intended financial and investment audience. 

  • Clause 26.2 Information to Current or Prospective Employees

    Information about pharmaceutical companies provided to current or prospective employees may relate to both existing medicines and those not yet marketed. Such information must be factual and presented in a balanced way.

  • Clause 26.2 Approval of Information

    Information on medicines made available under this clause other than responses from medical information departments or similar to unsolicited enquiries from the public must be certified in advance as required by Clause 14.3.

  • Clause 26.2 Health Technology Assessments

    Companies may supply information to relevant patient organisations, the public or patients in relation to forthcoming health technology assessments by public national organisations such as NICE, AWMSG or SMC, provided the information is accurate, not misleading, not promotional in nature and otherwise complies with Clause 26.2.

most recent cases See all Applicable Code year
Applicable Code year

Please check the date of the Code that applies to the Case that you are looking at. The date of the complaint may vary from the activity/material alleged to have been in breach.

AUTH/3499/4/21 - Complainant v Daiichi Sankyo Breach: 4.1, 9.1, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1, 28.3, 29 No breach: 2, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 02 April 2021 Completed: 06 December 2021 AUTH/3502/4/21 - Complainant v Daiichi Sankyo Breach: 4.1, 7.10, 9.1, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1, 28.3, 29 No breach: 2, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 10 April 2021 Completed: 06 December 2021 AUTH/3507/5/21 and AUTH/3513/5/21 - Complainant v Daiichi-Sankyo Breach: 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 7.2, 7.4, 9.1, 11.1, 29 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 03 May 2021 Completed: 06 December 2021 AUTH/3479/2/21 - Complainant v Almirall Breach: 4.1, 9.1, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 14.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 25 February 2021 Completed: 11 October 2021 AUTH/3421/11/20 - Complainant v Novartis Breach: 4.3, 9.1, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 26.3, 29 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 13 November 2020 Completed: 22 July 2021 AUTH/3414/11/20 - Complainant v Novartis Breach: 3.1, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.3 No breach: 2, 3.1, 4.1, 4.3, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 04 November 2020 Completed: 16 July 2021 AUTH/3404/10/20 - Indivior v Camurus Breach: 2, 4.1, 4.3, 4.9, 9.1, 9.10, 12.1, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1 No breach: 9.10 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 22 October 2020 Completed: 22 June 2021 AUTH/3356/5/20 - Complainant v Alexion Breach: 4.3, 9.1, 12.1, 26.2 No breach: 4.1 Received: 28 May 2020 Completed: 12 February 2021 AUTH/3372/8/20 - Complainant v Bristol-Myers Squibb Breach: 3.2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 12 August 2020 Completed: 29 January 2021 AUTH/3309/2/20 - Complainant v Sintetica Breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 9.1, 14.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 16 February 2020 Completed: 19 November 2020 AUTH/3276/10/19 - Complainant v Ipsen Breach: 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 3.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 25 October 2019 Completed: 28 August 2020 AUTH/3343/5/20 - Complainant v Shionogi Europe Breach: 2, 3.1, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 04 May 2020 Completed: 24 July 2020 AUTH/3299/1/20 - Complainant v Novo Nordisk Breach: 2, 9.1, 7.2, 15.1, 15.9, 26.2 No breach: 2, 3.2, 4.1, 7.3, 7.4, 7.9, 9.1, 14.1, 14.3, 14.5, 15.2, 16.1, 18.1, 18.2, 29 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 19 January 2020 Completed: 15 July 2020 AUTH/3203/6/19 - Anonymous employee v Otsuka Europe Breach: 9.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1 No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 07 June 2019 Completed: 23 April 2020 AUTH/3503/4/21 - Complainant v Leo Breach: 2, 3.2, 4.10, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.9, 7.10, 9.1 No breach: 2, 3.2, 4.1, 4.6, 4.9, 4.10, 7.2, 7.4, 7.6, 7.9, 7.10, 9.1, 9.2, 9.6, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 13 April 2021 Completed: 08 December 2022 AUTH/3523/6/21 - Complainant v Novo Nordisk No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 22 June 2021 Completed: 22 June 2022 AUTH/3519/5/21 - Member of the public v Pfizer Breach: 7.2, 9.1 No breach: 2, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 27 May 2020 Completed: 19 February 2022 AUTH/3483/3/21 - Complainant v Eli Lilly Breach: 3.1, 9.1 No breach: 2, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 04 March 2021 Completed: 18 January 2022 AUTH/3428/11/20 - Anonymous, contactable complainant v Leo Breach: 2, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 4.8, 7.2, 7.9, 9.1, 14.1, 14.3, 26.1 No breach: 3.1, 4.1, 4.3, 4.10, 7.2, 7.10, 9.1, 14.1, 14.3, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 11 November 2020 Completed: 12 January 2022 AUTH/3497/3/21 - Complainant v Daiichi Sankyo Breach: 7.2, 9.1 No breach: 2, 4.1, 7.2, 7.9, 9.1, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 27 March 2021 Completed: 16 December 2021 AUTH/3451/1/21 - Complainant v Teva Breach: 2, 3.2, 4.1, 4.6, 4.9, 9.1, 28.1 No breach: 2, 4.1, 4.2, 4.6, 4.9, 9.1, 9.9, 12.1, 14.1, 26.2, 26.3, 28.1, 28.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 05 January 2021 Completed: 02 December 2021 AUTH/3476/2/21 - Anonymous, contactable v Leo No breach: 2, 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.8, 4.10, 7.2, 7.3, 7.9, 7.11, 9.1, 12.1, 14.1, 14.3, 15.2, 15.9, 18.1, 19.1, 26.1, 26.2, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 09 February 2021 Completed: 18 November 2021 AUTH/3488/3/21 - Complainant v AstraZeneca Breach: 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 9.1, 14.1 No breach: 2, 4.3, 7.2, 7.4, 7.9, 7.10, 9.1, 9.7, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 10 March 2021 Completed: 29 September 2021 AUTH/3463/1/21 - Complainant v Lundbeck Breach: 14.5 No breach: 2, 3.1, 4.1, 4.9, 9.1, 12.1, 14.1, 14.3, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 25 January 2021 Completed: 27 September 2021 AUTH/3405/10/20 - Complainant v Leo Breach: 4.1, 4.5, 4.6, 4.9, 9.1, 14.1, 14.3, 28.1 No breach: 2, 3.1, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.8, 4.9, 9.10, 14.1, 14.3, 16.1, 18.1, 26.1, 26.2, 26.3, 28.1, 28.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 25 October 2020 Completed: 10 September 2021 AUTH/3478/2/21 - Complainant v Boehringer Ingelheim No breach: 2, 3.1, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 22 February 2021 Completed: 07 September 2021 AUTH/3400/10/20 - Complainant v Novartis Breach: 2, 3.1, 9.1, 9.10, 12.1, 14.1, 28.1 No breach: 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 18 October 2020 Completed: 16 August 2021 AUTH/3450/1/21 - Complainant v Lundbeck Breach: 4.1, 4.9, 9.1, 14.1 No breach: 2, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1, 28.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 05 January 2021 Completed: 05 August 2021 AUTH/3409/10/20 - Complainant v Daiichi Sankyo Breach: 2, 3.2, 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.8, 4.9, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.10, 9.1, 14.1 No breach: 9.1, 9.9, 9.10, 11.1, 11.3, 12.1, 14.5, 23.1 , 23.2, 24.1, 24.2, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 29 October 2020 Completed: 01 April 2021 AUTH/3394/10/20 - Anonymous health professional v Novartis Breach: 27.2 No breach: 2, 7.8, 9.1, 26.2, 27.9 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 04 October 2020 Completed: 22 March 2021 AUTH/3364/6/20 - Complainant v AstraZeneca No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 18 June 2020 Completed: 18 March 2021 AUTH/3311/2/20 - Complainant v Leo Breach: 2, 3.1, 9.1 No breach: 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 18 February 2020 Completed: 25 February 2021 AUTH/3386/9/20 - Health professional v GlaxoSmithKline No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2, 26.3, 28.6 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 14 September 2020 Completed: 19 February 2021 AUTH/3363/6/20 - Complainant v GlaxoSmithKline No breach: 9.1, 14.3, 14.5, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 15 June 2020 Completed: 18 January 2021 AUTH/3336/4/20 - Anonymous v Bio Products Laboratory AUTH/3336/4/20 - Anonymous v Bio Products Laboratory No breach: 2, 7.2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 23 April 2020 Completed: 07 January 2021 AUTH/3337/4/20 - Anonymous v Bio Products Laboratory No breach: 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 23 April 2020 Completed: 07 January 2021 AUTH/3439/12/20 - Complainant v Amgen Breach: 9.1 No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 07 December 2020 Completed: 07 December 2020 AUTH/3315/3/20 – Anonymous v Novo Nordisk No breach: 9.1, 9.2, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 05 March 2020 Completed: 17 September 2020 AUTH/3288/12/19 - NHS Worker v Biogen No breach: 2, 9.1, 12.1, 15.2, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 13 December 2019 Completed: 16 September 2020 AUTH/3270/10/19 - Complainant v Bayer Breach: 9.1 No breach: 2, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 25 October 2019 Completed: 05 August 2020 AUTH/3266/10/19 and AUTH/3279/11/19 - Health Professional v Otsuka UK and Otsuka Europe Breach: 7.2, 7.4, 7.9, 9.1 No breach: 7.2, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 26 September 2019 Completed: 15 May 2020 AUTH/3204/6/19 - Anonymous pharmaceutical employee v GlaxoSmithKline No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 07 June 2019 Completed: 27 April 2020 AUTH/3287/12/19 - Employee v UCB Breach: 3.1, 14.1, 9.1 No breach: 2, 4.1, 4.9, 4.10, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 13 December 2019 Completed: 27 March 2020 AUTH/3310/2/20: Ex-employee v Indivior No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 17 February 2020 Completed: 21 May 2019

26.3 Any material which relates to a medicine and which is intended for patients taking that medicine must include the statement below or a similar one:

‘Reporting of side effects'

If you get any side effects, talk to your doctor, pharmacist or nurse. This includes any possible side effects not listed in the package leaflet. You can also report side effects directly via the Yellow Card Scheme at [a web address which links directly to the MHRA Yellow Card site]. 

By reporting side effects you can help provide more information on the safety of this medicine.’

When the material relates to a medicine which is subject to additional monitoring an inverted black equilateral triangle must be included on it together with the statement below or a similar one:

‘This medicine is subject to additional monitoring. This will allow quick identification of new safety information. You can help by reporting any side effects you may get. See [a web address which links directly to the MHRA Yellow Card site] for how to report side effects.’

  • Clause 26.3 Obligatory Wording

    The obligatory wording required corresponds to that required for package leaflets by the European Quality Review of Documents Group which updated the requirements in The Human Medicines Regulations 2012. If the suggested wording is not used the same meaning must be conveyed.

    In the event that the website address given in Clause 26.3 is changed by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, companies may use a statement incorporating the new address as soon as the change is made and must use the new address within one year of the change.

  • Clause 26.3 Black Triangle Symbol

    Details of the black triangle symbol can be found in the supplementary information to Clause 4.10.

most recent cases See all Applicable Code year
Applicable Code year

Please check the date of the Code that applies to the Case that you are looking at. The date of the complaint may vary from the activity/material alleged to have been in breach.

AUTH/3432/12/20 - Complainant v GlaxoSmithKline Breach: 2, 3.2, 4.3, 4.9, 4.10, 9.1, 14.1, 26.3 No breach: 2, 4.2, 4.10, 7.2, 9.1 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 28 November 2020 Completed: 06 September 2021 AUTH/3499/4/21 - Complainant v Daiichi Sankyo Breach: 4.1, 9.1, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1, 28.3, 29 No breach: 2, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 02 April 2021 Completed: 06 December 2021 AUTH/3502/4/21 - Complainant v Daiichi Sankyo Breach: 4.1, 7.10, 9.1, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1, 28.3, 29 No breach: 2, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 10 April 2021 Completed: 06 December 2021 AUTH/3451/1/21 - Complainant v Teva Breach: 2, 3.2, 4.1, 4.6, 4.9, 9.1, 28.1 No breach: 2, 4.1, 4.2, 4.6, 4.9, 9.1, 9.9, 12.1, 14.1, 26.2, 26.3, 28.1, 28.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 05 January 2021 Completed: 02 December 2021 AUTH/3476/2/21 - Anonymous, contactable v Leo No breach: 2, 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.8, 4.10, 7.2, 7.3, 7.9, 7.11, 9.1, 12.1, 14.1, 14.3, 15.2, 15.9, 18.1, 19.1, 26.1, 26.2, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 09 February 2021 Completed: 18 November 2021 AUTH/3418/11/20 - Pharmaceutical physician v Leo Pharma Breach: 9.1, 13.1, 27.7 No breach: 2, 9.1, 14.3, 14.5, 20, 24.1, 24.9, 26.3, 27.7, 28.6 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 11 November 2020 Completed: 18 November 2021 AUTH/3405/10/20 - Complainant v Leo Breach: 4.1, 4.5, 4.6, 4.9, 9.1, 14.1, 14.3, 28.1 No breach: 2, 3.1, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.8, 4.9, 9.10, 14.1, 14.3, 16.1, 18.1, 26.1, 26.2, 26.3, 28.1, 28.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 25 October 2020 Completed: 10 September 2021 AUTH/3421/11/20 - Complainant v Novartis Breach: 4.3, 9.1, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 26.3, 29 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 13 November 2020 Completed: 22 July 2021 AUTH/3386/9/20 - Health professional v GlaxoSmithKline No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2, 26.3, 28.6 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 14 September 2020 Completed: 19 February 2021 AUTH/3303/1/20 - Anonymous complainant v Vifor Breach: 7.2, 7.4, 9.1, 26.1, 28.1, 28.3 No breach: 2, 4.1, 4.9, 7.2, 7.4, 9.1, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 23 January 2020 Completed: 03 August 2020

26.4 Requests from individual members of the public for advice on personal medical matters must be refused and the enquirer recommended to consult his or her own doctor or other prescriber or other health professional.

  • Clause 26.4 Requests for Information or Advice on Personal Medical Matters

    This clause prohibits the provision of advice on personal medical matters to individual members of the public requesting it. The intention behind this prohibition is to ensure that companies do not intervene in the patient/doctor or patient/prescriber relationship by offering advice or information which properly should be in the domain of the doctor or other prescriber.

    Pharmaceutical companies can provide information appropriate to support the use of medicines and enhance patient welfare. Emergency advice, for example action needed in the event of an overdose, can be provided. Other information may also be given, including information on medicines prescribed for the enquirer, provided that it complies with the requirements of Clauses 26.1 and 26.2 and does not impinge on the principle behind this clause. For example, answering requests from members of the public as to whether a particular medicine contains sucrose or some other inactive ingredient, or whether there would be problems associated with drinking alcohol whilst taking the medicine or whether the medicine should be taken before or after a meal, is acceptable. Particular care needs to be taken with regard to enquiries relating to adverse reactions, the indications for a medicine and suchlike.

    All requests from members of the public must be handled with great care and a company should refer the enquirer to other sources where appropriate. These might include health professionals, NHS Choices, NHS 111, their equivanlents in the devolved nations and patient organisations, etc.

    A request from a patient for information may in some instances best be handled by passing the information to the patient’s doctor or other prescriber for discussion with them rather than providing the information direct to the patient concerned. This should not be done without the patient’s consent.

26.5 Companies are responsible for information about their products which is issued by their public relations agencies.